Why Consentics exists

A cookie banner and an analytics tool are usually sold separately, by two different vendors, with no connection between them. That gap is the whole problem this product was built to close.

The problem we kept seeing

Run a consent banner and a separate analytics tool, and the moment a visitor declines, the two stop talking to each other. The banner did its job and recorded the decision. The analytics tool ignores it and simply stops counting that visitor. Nobody planned it that way; it is just what happens when consent and measurement are two different products from two different vendors, bolted together after the fact.

Consentics runs both halves as one system instead. The same product that captures a visitor's decision is the one that decides how to measure them, so a decline changes what gets measured, not whether anything does.

The thesis

Consent and analytics should be one decision, made once, honoured everywhere the data is used.

Where we fit

Most sites arrive at Consentics from one of two directions. Some already run a cookie banner from a compliance vendor and want the analytics behind it to actually work, instead of a second tool bolted on that quietly drops every visitor who declines. Others already run privacy-conscious analytics and want the consent decision built in as part of the same system, rather than a compliance checkbox stapled on top.

Both routes lead to the same product, because the underlying problem is the same: consent and measurement need to be one decision, not two tools that disagree.

Get notified at launch

Consentics isn't live yet. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment it is.

Thanks. We'll email you the moment Consentics is live.